Skip to main content
Contacts hold personal data about people who never signed up for an account: donors, ticket buyers, newsletter subscribers, form respondents. This page answers two questions. Who on your team can reach that data, and what can you actually do when one of those people asks you about it. Built for the administrator who decides who is trusted with the contact list, and the person who has to answer a data-protection request with the tools the product really has. This page assumes the permission model on Permissions: every permission is a domain (HR, Financial, Admin) paired with a scope (organisation, regional, chapter). Only the contact-specific parts are covered here. Contacts module settings showing the Enable Contacts Module, Enable Contact Statuses and Enable Per-Chapter Contacts switches

What each action needs

Emailing is not a contact permission at all. Contacts are reached in bulk through newsletter campaigns, which are governed by the Communication Manager domain. Someone can hold Communication Manager and send to your whole contact audience without ever being able to open a single contact record, and the reverse is equally true.

The permission line is wider than it looks

Every contact screen asks for the same thing: HR or Financial permission on the chapter. Written out, that sounds like two narrow chapter-level grants. It is not. Because a permission held higher up satisfies a check lower down, and because Admin covers the other domains at the same level, nine different permissions open the contact list:
Granting a permission that sounds unrelated to contacts still grants the contact list. ADMIN_LOCAL for a chapter secretary, FINANCIAL_PARENT_LOCAL for a regional treasurer, HR_TENANT for a membership officer: all three open contacts. If the contact directory holds donor or subscriber data you would not hand to those people, decide that before you tick the box, not afterwards.
HR Assistant does not reach contacts. It is the one HR-family permission that does not, and holding it changes nothing about the contact module. Event Manager and Communication Manager do not reach contacts either.

Ordinary members cannot reach contacts

A member with no administrative permission has no route to the contact directory: not the list, not a record, not search, not export. There is no minimum access level setting that opens contacts to regular users, and nothing in the member-facing product links to them. Contacts are an administrative surface only.

Chapter scoping

A contact can be filed under a chapter, and chapter administrators can then be limited to their own. This needs two settings switched on together: Both on, and scoping applies:
  • Organisation-scope managers (HR_TENANT, FINANCIAL_TENANT, ADMIN_TENANT) see every contact, including contacts with no chapter.
  • Everyone else sees only contacts in the chapters they cover. Someone who covers no chapter sees an empty list rather than an error.
  • Creating a contact files it under the creator’s own chapter by default, and a chapter-scoped admin cannot file one outside the chapters they cover.
  • Editing is re-checked after the change, so a chapter admin cannot move a contact out of their scope or leave it unfiled.
With Per-Chapter Contacts off, chapter-scoped administrators get no contacts at all, rather than a scoped view. HR_LOCAL and FINANCIAL_LOCAL holders are refused the list, the record and every write. Only organisation-scope managers keep access. Turning the setting off to “simplify things” therefore removes contacts from your chapter teams entirely.
A contact with no chapter is invisible to chapter administrators, even with the setting on. Contacts created by donations, ticket sales and newsletter signups usually arrive unfiled, so on a scoped organisation most incoming contacts are visible only to organisation-scope managers until someone files them.

CSV export, and what is recorded

Export is the one contact action that does not follow the nine-permission rule. It requires HR_TENANT or ADMIN_TENANT. A chapter or regional administrator who can read every contact on screen still cannot export them, and adding a chapter filter to the request does not change that. Every export writes a row to the Activity Log recording who exported, when, and the exact request that was made, including any filters. That is your record of who took a copy of the directory.
The same data pulled another way is not recorded the same way. Reading contacts through the API or through an assistant on the Orgo MCP connection is an ordinary read of the contact list: it leaves no export entry, because no export happened. If your controls depend on knowing when the directory left the product, treat API tokens and connected apps as their own control point, and scope them narrowly.
The report builder is a second export route. It is ADMIN_TENANT only, it can include contacts and their payments, tags and custom fields, and its exports are recorded too. See Reports.

Data protection

Below is what the product does and does not do with contact personal data. Read it as a description of the mechanics, not as advice about your obligations.

What is stored

A contact record holds name and middle name, email, phone, address, town and country, date of birth, gender, a personal identification number, a bio, employer and role, social profiles, company details, tags, status, source, notes, custom field answers, and links to payments, invoices, form submissions and event registrations. Of everything on a contact, only the personal identification number is encrypted at rest. Email, phone, address, date of birth and gender are stored as ordinary text. Individual custom fields can be marked as encrypted, one field at a time, but that is opt-in and off unless someone set it. The personal identification number is never returned by the normal record; the record only says whether one exists. Reading the value has a single door, restricted to HR_TENANT, FINANCIAL_TENANT and ADMIN_TENANT, and every reveal is recorded with who did it, when, and from where. If that record cannot be written, the reveal is refused.

Identity documents

An identity record can be attached to a contact, carrying an identification number, the document type, serial, number and dates, an address, a date of birth, and scanned images of the document itself. These usually arrive through the flows described in Identity Validation. Treat any contact with an attached identity as holding considerably more sensitive data than the record on screen suggests.

What you can do for a data-protection request

  • Produce a copy of what you hold. There is no “download everything about this person” button. What exists is the contact record itself, which shows notes, activity, payments, invoices, event registrations and custom field answers on one screen, and the CSV export, which covers the directory fields but not notes, payments or emails. Assembling a full answer means reading the record and copying from it.
  • Correct data. Edit the record, in the normal way.
  • Stop email. Unsubscribe the contact, or let them use the unsubscribe link in any campaign. This does not remove the record.
  • Clear the personal identification number by saving an empty value on the record.
  • Delete the contact, subject to the limit below.

What the product does not do

  • There is no anonymisation. Nothing replaces a contact’s details with placeholders while keeping the record. Deletion is a real deletion of the row, not a flag, and it cannot be undone.
  • Deletion is refused while the contact has any payment, invoice or contract. There is no option to erase the person and keep the financial record. For most organisations this means a contact who has ever paid you anything, a donor, a ticket buyer, an invoiced partner, cannot be deleted at all, and those are exactly the people most likely to ask. The only contacts you can delete are ones with no money and no signed document attached.
  • Deleting a contact destroys their activity history with them, including the records of who exported the contact list containing them and who revealed their personal identification number. Export anything you need to keep before deleting.
  • Deletion does not reach data already sent elsewhere, such as email logs, records synced to a connected CRM, or payloads already delivered to your webhooks.
  • There is no retention policy and no automatic expiry. Contacts, notes and log entries stay until somebody removes them. Nothing ages out on its own.
  • Consent is a single switch. Newsletter subscription is subscribed, unsubscribed, or never asked. There is no consent timestamp, no record of where consent came from, and no per-purpose consent on a contact.
Your organisation is the data controller for everything in your contact directory. Orgo gives you the mechanics described above and nothing more; deciding what you may collect, how long you may keep it, and how you answer a request from a data subject is yours to determine, with your own legal advice. Nothing on this page is legal advice and no feature described here makes an organisation compliant with any law.

What is recorded about a contact

Some, but not all, of what happens to a contact is written to the audit log. Two more limits are worth knowing. Nothing is logged for changes made by an import, by an automation, or by any unauthenticated flow such as a public form or a donation checkout, so a field that changed by itself changed through one of those. And demo organisations write no log entries at all.
The field-change history is written, but no screen presents it. The Activity card on a contact record deliberately leaves field edits out; it shows notes, tags, donations, form submissions and personal identification number changes. The Activity Log screen, which does show before and after values, exists for members and not for contacts. So “who changed this contact’s email address” is recorded but not answerable from the product interface.

Troubleshooting

Check the two settings first. Chapter scoping needs the Local Centers module and Enable Per-Chapter Contacts switched on together. With Per-Chapter Contacts off, chapter-scoped administrators are refused contacts outright rather than given a scoped view, which looks identical to a permission problem.With both on, check what they hold. HR Assistant does not reach contacts, and neither does Event Manager or Communication Manager. They need HR, Financial or Admin at chapter, regional or organisation scope.If they hold the right permission and the list is still empty, the contacts probably have no chapter. Unfiled contacts are invisible to chapter-scoped administrators, and contacts created by donations, ticket sales and signups arrive unfiled. An organisation-scope manager can open those and file them.
Deletion is refused while the contact has any payment, invoice or contract attached, and there is no way to override it or to erase the person while keeping the financial record. This is the expected behaviour, not a fault, and it applies to every donor and ticket buyer.If the request came from the person themselves, what you can do instead is unsubscribe them from email, clear the personal identification number, and remove notes and any detail you do not need to keep. The record and its financial history stay.A bulk delete from the list can also stop on the same rule. If a selection includes one contact with a payment, deal with that one separately rather than retrying the batch.
Every CSV export writes an entry to the Activity Log naming the person, the time, and the exact request including any filters. Reading that log needs ADMIN_TENANT. Report builder exports are recorded too.Two gaps to keep in mind. Contacts pulled through the API, a connected app or an assistant over MCP are ordinary reads and produce no export entry, so the log answers “who used the export button”, not “who has a copy”. And deleting a contact deletes the export entries that mention them, so a log reviewed after a clean-up may be missing rows.
Ordinary members have no access to the contact directory, so check what the member actually holds on their Permissions tab. ADMIN_LOCAL and FINANCIAL_LOCAL both open contacts even though neither is labelled HR, and a permission attached to their role counts the same as one ticked on their profile. See Assigning Permissions.If they hold nothing, they are almost certainly seeing a contact through another feature rather than through the directory: as an attendee on an event they can see, as a name on an invoice, or mentioned in a discussion. Those surfaces have their own visibility rules and show far less than a contact record does.